Saved-position review

Saved positions from your own mistakes after review

Start with a real game. Analyze it, save stable missed chances and blunders, then revisit the position that actually happened.

Saved positions come from reviewed games

Missed opportunities and blunders stay separate

No generic puzzle pool is injected

Zero-position games stay honest

Review flow

Start with one game

These pages all lead back to the same place: import a game, review it, and use what the review found.

Step 1

Open a recent game, PGN, file, or link in the review workspace.

Step 2

ChessIQ looks for missed chances and costly mistakes that have enough support.

Step 3

Valid candidates become saved positions tied to the game they came from.

Step 4

Start all positions or focus on missed opportunities or blunders.

Proof

Each saved position came from a game you reviewed, with the surrounding story still available.

If candidate validation rejects every position, ChessIQ does not pretend positions were saved.

Missed opportunities help you find stronger moves; blunders help you recover costly mistakes.

Saved positions, Archive, and Statistics all read from the same local reviewed-game history.

The URL stays `/puzzles`, but the product role is saved positions from your reviewed games.

You can open saved positions, but useful positions appear only after review creates them.

No. ChessIQ does not seed a generic puzzle pool into this loop.

Short, quiet, already-decided, or unsupported positions may not produce a stable saved position.

Start